Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Harrisburg Misinformation Challenge

Welcome to Week 2 of the COVID-19 Misinformation Challenge!

The COVID-19 vaccines were developed quickly, but were created from decades of solid, peer-reviewed and widely accepted scientific research. Their rapid development, however, has led to many theories circulated online with varying levels of plausibility. This is the type of environment that is ripe for conspiracy theories to spread, as many start with a plausible scenario that is twisted into an outrageous idea. Many conspiracy theories require extra work to determine their accuracy.

Prepare for This Week's Challenge

Once you have encountered a news story or social media post that you suspect may not be accurate or may have been deliberately shared to misinform, the next step is to investigate the source. This applies both to the publisher (i.e. the website or media organization publishing this story) as well as the author and/or individuals within the source that are making the claims. It is important to go beyond the story or publisher itself to investigate any known biases of the publisher/author/source as well as their experience as it relates to the topic being discussed. This should be done by opening a new tab in the browser and searching the web for information on the publishing organization/website, author, and/or interviewed sources. You may also want to search for what types of news stories and claims these sources have shared in the past. Have they been known to share inaccurate information? If it appears the publisher or author have well known biases, or have been known to share fake news stories in the past, you'll need to dig a little deeper to ensure the information is accurate.

In addition to the source, you can also check specific stories on various fact-checking sites like,, and Politifact. These sites do not have an overt political bias and are helpful in examining the truth of various claims and theories on the web. While all three of the above sites examine claims made by politicians, Snopes will also examine non-political stories circulating on the internet.

If you want to do a deep dive, check out Sifting Through the Coronavirus Pandemic from digital information literacy expert Mike Caulfield. We'll be following Caulfield's 4-move SIFT methodology throughout the challenge. This week, we're focusing on Stop and Investigate the Source.

Need more help with identifying "fake news"? The International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) has a resource available in multiple languages here.

Stop; Investigate the Source; Find Better Coverage; Trace Claims, Quotes and Media to the Original Context

SIFT Infographic by Mike Caulfield is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Your Challenge: Determine if Posts on Social Media are Accurate (or Not)  

  1. For each of the posts below, identify the source--look for logos, authors, sources within the news stories and publisher or account names.
  2. If you aren't familiar with the source, don't trust it, or no sources are cited, open up a new tab in your browser and investigate. What are people saying about this topic? Is it trustworthy?
  3. Based on your findings, determine if the post is true or false, then click the Submit button to complete your answer. Note: This quiz is anonymous.
  4. Click on "View Score" to see what you got right and wrong, and get feedback on the answers. 

Further Resources